Case Study Research Jobs

1. Drake R, Green A, Mueser K, Goldman H. The history of community mental health treatment and rehabilitation for persons with severe mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2003;39(5):427–440. doi: 10.1023/A:1025860919277.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

2. Coniglio FD, Hancock N, Ellis A. Peer support within clubhouse: a grounded theory study. Community Ment Health J. 2010;48(2):153–160. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9358-5.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

3. McKay C. Health promotion in clubhouse programs: needs, barriers, and current and planned activities. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007;31(2):155–159. doi: 10.2975/31.2.2007.155.159.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

4. Boyd AS, Bentley KJ. The relationship between the level of personal empowerment and quality of life among psychosocial clubhouse members and consumer-operated drop-in center participants. Soc Work Ment Health. 2005;4(2):67–93. doi: 10.1300/J200v04n02_05.[Cross Ref]

5. Magaw K. The vocational development functions of the clubhouse. New York: Springer; 2004.

6. Macias C, Rodican C, Hargreaves W, Jones D, Barreira P, Wang Q. Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(10):1406–1415. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1406.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]

7. Dudek KJ, Aquila R. Fountain house and recovery centers. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(4):396. doi: 10.1176/[PubMed][Cross Ref]

8. Pernice-Duca F, Onaga E. Examining the contribution of social network support to the recovery process among clubhouse members. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2009;12(1):1–30. doi: 10.1080/15487760802615566.[Cross Ref]

9. Kightley M, Einfeld S, Hancock N. Routine outcome measurement in mental health: feasibility for examining effectiveness of an NGO. Australas Psychiatr. 2010;18(2):167–169. doi: 10.3109/10398560903473660.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

10. Raeburn T, Halcomb E, Walter G, Cleary M. An overview of the clubhouse model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Australas Psychiatr. 2013;21(4):376–378. doi: 10.1177/1039856213492235.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

11. Hancock N, Bundy A, Honey A, James G, Tamsett S. Improving measurement properties of the recovery assessment scale with rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(6):77–85. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.001818.[Cross Ref]

12. Burgess P, Pirkis J, Coombs T, Rosen A. Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(4):267–280. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.549996.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

13. Luck L, Jackson D, Usher K. Case study: a bridge across the paradigms. Nurs Inq. 2006;13(2):103–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2006.00309.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

14. Hungerford C, Kench P. The perceptions of health professionals of the implementation of Recovery-oriented health services: a case study analysis. J Ment Health Train Educ Pract. 2013;8(4):5.

15. Zainal Z. Case study as a research method. J Kemanus. 2007;9:1–6.

16. Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. Fourth. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.

17. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J. 2007;50(1):25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.[Cross Ref]

18. Tight M. The curious case of case study: a viewpoint. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2010;13(4):329–339. doi: 10.1080/13645570903187181.[Cross Ref]

19. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.

20. Boll J. Member roles in program evaluation: a case study from a psychosocial clubhouse. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1995;19(1):79–82. doi: 10.1037/h0095455.[Cross Ref]

21. Asmussen SM, Romano J, Beatty P, Gasarch L, Shaughnessey S. Old answers for today’s problems: integrating individuals who are homeless with mental illness into existing community-based programs: a case study of Fountain House. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1994;18(1):75. doi: 10.1037/h0095532.[Cross Ref]

22. Goertzel V, Beard JH, Pilnick S. Fountain House Foundation: case study of an expatient’s club. J Soc Issues. 1960;16(2):54–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1960.tb00949.x.[Cross Ref]

23. Jacobs S, Davidson L, Steiner J, Hoge M. The integration of treatment and rehabilitation in psychiatric practice and services: a case study of a community mental health center. Community Ment Health J. 2002;38(1):73–81. doi: 10.1023/A:1013964132596.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

24. Cowell A, Pollio D, North C, Stewart A, McCabe M. Deriving service costs for a clubhouse psychosocial rehabilitation program. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2003;30(4):323–340. doi: 10.1023/A:1024085200791.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

25. CASP. Critical appraisal skills program. In: http://www.casp-uknet/. Oxford: CASP Checklists; 2014.

26. Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Limited; 2013.

27. Tellis W. Application of a case study methodology. Qual Rep. 1997;3(3):1–17.

28. Geller JL. The last half-century of psychiatric services as reflected in psychiatric services. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51(1):41–67. doi: 10.1176/ps.51.1.41.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

29. Porter R. The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity. London: WW Norton & Company; 1999.

30. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publications; 2008.

31. Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P. Case study method: key issues, key texts. London: Sage; 2000.

32. NHMRC. Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. Canberra: National Health Medical Research Council; 2007.

33. Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(1):77–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00662.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

34. Hunt G, Siegfried N, Morley K, Sitharthan T, Cleary M. Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:10.[PubMed]

35. Johnsen M, McKay C, Henry AD, Manning TD. What does competitive employment mean? A secondary analysis of employment approaches in the Massachusetts Employment Intervention Demonstration Project. Res Community Ment Health. 2004;13:43–62. doi: 10.1016/S0192-0812(04)13002-X.[Cross Ref]

36. Salkever DS. Policy priorities and shifting sands in the supported employment evidence base. Psychiatry Online. 2006;57(10):1440.[PubMed]

37. Yin R. The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q. 1981;26(1):58–65. doi: 10.2307/2392599.[Cross Ref]

38. Feagin JR, Orum AM. A case for the case study. Wilmington: UNC Press; 1991.

39. Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.

40. Wong KF. Implementation of Clubhouse model programme: perception of mental health nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010;17(8):750–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01601.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

41. Aquila R, Santos G, Malamud T, McCrory D. The rehabilitation alliance in practice: the clubhouse connection. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1999;23(1):19–23. doi: 10.1037/h0095199.[Cross Ref]

42. Denzin NK, Lincoln Y. Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.

43. Bergen A, While A. A case for case studies: exploring the use of case study design in community nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(4):926–934. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01356.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

44. Horsfall J, Cleary M, Walter G, Malins G. Challenging conventional practice: placing consumers at the centre of the research enterprise. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2007;28(11):1201–1213. doi: 10.1080/01612840701651488.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

45. Mowbray C, Lewandowski L, Holter M, Bybee D. The clubhouse as an empowering setting. Health Soc Work. 2006;31(3):167–179. doi: 10.1093/hsw/31.3.167.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

46. Cleary M, Escott P, Horsfall J, Walter G, Jackson D. Qualitative research: the optimal scholarly means of understanding the patient experience. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014;35(11):902–904. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.965619.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

47. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8(3):341–351. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800305.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

48. Noyes J, Popay J. Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(3):227–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04092.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]

49. Warner R. Does the scientific evidence support the recovery model? Psychiatrist. 2010;34(1):3–5. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.109.025643.[Cross Ref]

Skip to content,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

ACT education experts recommend high-quality learning resources to help kids from pre-school through high school. Click Here to Learn More 

This action will open a new window. Do you want to proceed?

R.J. Reynolds targets a highly-skilled workforce candidate pool

North Carolina-based R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company uses the ACT WorkKeys® system as part of its robust pre-hire screening and hiring process.


Boeing reduces training time and improves retention with ACT WorkKeys Assessments

Learn how Boeing reduced hiring and training time by implementing WorkKeys Assessments into the Assembly Mechanic pre-employment training programs


Eastman uses ACT WorkKeys to develop quality talent pipeline

Learn how Eastman became a model in the Northeast Tennessee region by implementing ACT WorkKeys solutions to increase their workforce quality and bring rewarding career opportunities to its community.


Positive relationship between higher NCRC and WorkKeys skill levels and wages.

A study of Adult NCRC examinee data shows that, on average, individuals who score higher on the WorkKeys Assessments and earn high levels on the NCRC can expect short and long-term increases in wages.


Preparing students for workplace success

To satisfy the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction’s goal of providing a comprehensive approach to college and career readiness, educators use WorkKeys® assessments to help students measure their skills—and see how they compare to what employers require.


Helping job seekers stand out to employers

Phillips Staffing deployed ACT-authorized job profilers to work directly with area employers to analyze jobs and identify required skill levels. Next they used WorkKeys assessments to help their clients measure and certify the skills employers needed.


Matching the right people to a specialized job

The Lexington County, South Carolina, 911 Communications Center needed to find the right people for a highly specialized job. The center worked with an ACT job profiler to better understand their needs, and then they administered WorkKeys assessments to measure applicants’ skills, which reduced their turnover and improved training.


Reducing employee turnover and product waste

Berner Foods was experiencing high turnover, significant training time and cost, and product waste due to evolving technology and related skill requirements. A combination of Job Profiling, WorkKeys, and the National Career Readiness Certificate helped them better understand the skills they need—and find the people who had them.


Identifying quality applicants

Inova Health was approaching a turnover rate of nearly 50 percent for two vital, entry-level positions. They were caught in a cycle of making quick hires instead of quality ones. By implementing WorkKeys, they found a way to instead make a quality hire more quickly and drastically reduce their turnover.


Using skills certification to find the best talent

A new plant meant new growth opportunities for CG Power Systems. But it also meant new challenges. Changing skill requirements meant finding high-quality candidates for the new facility. The National Career Readiness Certificate helped them verify candidates’ skill levels and make the right hires.


Streamlining applicant screening

Subaru of Indiana Automotive used their region’s largest single job creation initiative in nearly 20 years to double its plant’s production capabilities and open more than 1,000 new jobs—for which 22,300 applications were received. ACT helped them establish an efficient screening system to hire the best people from the pool of candidates.


Finding work faster

When Ohio’s economy struggled, hundreds of manufacturing employees lost their jobs—with no documentation of the skill levels they had developed. State workforce and social service agencies, along with union organizations, tuned to the National Career Readiness Certificate to help the displaced workers verify their skill levels and find employment.


Ensuring a skilled workforce for thousands of job openings

To address both long- and short-term workforce development plans, the West Alabama region came together to develop a holistic approach supported by ACT WorkKeys® solutions.


Reducing entry-level job turnover

To reduce turnover and train better-skilled entry-level workers, Phifer Incorporated, in West Alabama, uses ACT WorkKeys® solutions to build a skilled regional workforce.


Finding trainable talent

Frustrated with traditional hiring practices, Glen Raven Custom Fabrics worked with the Tri-County Region to develop a skilled talent pipeline using ACT WorkKeys® solutions.


Ensuring a skilled workforce for manufacturing job growth

To provide a pipeline of dependable, quality workers for manufacturing jobs, the Tri-County Region developed an approach supported by ACT WorkKeys® solutions.


Wanted: Employees with the right skills

General Plug and Manufacturing partnered on a regional CNC credentialing program using ACT WorkKeys® solutions.


Regional skill shifts

Facing sudden negative economic impact, Lorain County, Ohio, focused on reskilling workers, especially steelworkers, for new careers as they developed an emerging workforce for key sectors.


Improving retention and employee safety

Facing employee turnover as high as 100%, Gilchrist Construction Company used ACTWorkKeys® solutions to improve hiring, retention, training, safety, and productivity at their Louisiana-based facility.


Raising the quality of new hires while reducing turnover and costs

Louisiana-based forestry and wood-products manufacturer RoyOMartin used ACT WorkKeys®solutions to decrease turnover and optimize training costs.




Developing highly skilled, specialized talent pipeline from the ground up

In need of workers with very specific, highly specialized skills not found in the region, Safran Aerospace Composites, Inc. used ACT WorkKeys® solutions to develop local talent.




Understanding and Solving the Skills Gap

A Call to Action

National Workforce Solutions Advisory Board

ACT JobPro®: Defining, describing, and projecting American jobs

The ACT NCRC®: An evidence-based credential

ACT WorkKeys®: Awarding college credit through the ACT NCRC®

The ACT NCRC® and ACT WorkKeys®: Making a Difference in Outcomes for Workers and Employers

ACT WorkKeys® Assessments and the NNBIA's Common Employability Skills Framework

ACT WorkKeys® Curriculum Profiling: A Step-By-Step Guide

ACT WorkKeys NCRC Crosswalk to Beta Connecting Credential Framework

ACT WorkKeys Case Studies and Research

0 thoughts on “Case Study Research Jobs”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *