Margaret Thatcher Speeches Analysis Essay

Citation

Measuring Rhetorical Leadership: A Textual Analysis of Margaret Thatcher's and Ronald Reagan's Speeches

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan have often been described as political "soul-mates" with a shared conservative political philosophy and a "conviction" leadership style. While a general acceptance of the similarities of these leaders has taken hold in both the academic and popular literatures, no one yet has sought to challenge empirically the merit of this premise. To what extent did their shared beliefs overshadow other, perhaps even quite fundamental, differences in their views on governing and public policy? Using a sample of the major speeches of both leaders, we employ automated content analysis ("Alceste" software) to measure statistically (using the chi-square statistic) and spatially (using correspondence analysis) the rhetoric unique to each leader while in office as prime minister and president. We recognize the importance of rhetoric to the leadership effectiveness of Thatcher and Reagan--both often characterized as populist leaders--advancing many of the same themes in their major addresses, but also conveying some differences. Hence, our approach enables us to analyze empirically each and every word of our sampled major addresses, thereby extracting not only the themes associated with each leader, but also to gauge the relative statistical significance of these themes as they relate to each leader. Our aim is to identify not only the shared rhetoric of the leaders but more revealingly, to identify and measure significant differences--which in turn, enables us to understand better their styles of political leadership. The results of our analysis are striking and somewhat surprising. While the two leaders agreed on the importance of the Soviet threat and on some aspects of domestic economic policy, Reagan was unique in using religious symbols to describe American exceptionalism (American civil religion) while Thatcher was unique in shaping conservatism around domestic economic policy goals such as privatization. In short, our approach allows us to identify and measure empirically both the shared themes and the differences between the two conservative leaders.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

reagan(249), thatcher(203), analysi(137), speech(136), class(124), rhetor(115), leadership(109), polit(83), word(75), theme(74), 2(71), ronald(61), textual(61), bailey(59), schonhardt(57), measur(57), leader(57), american(57), schonhardt-bailey(56), margaret(55), 1(53),
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name:American Political Science Association
URL:http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:

MLA Citation:

Yager, Edward. and Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl."Measuring Rhetorical Leadership: A Textual Analysis of Margaret Thatcher's and Ronald Reagan's Speeches" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007<Not Available>. 2013-12-15 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p210895_index.html>

APA Citation:

Yager, E. M. and Schonhardt-Bailey, C. M., 2007-08-30"Measuring Rhetorical Leadership: A Textual Analysis of Margaret Thatcher's and Ronald Reagan's Speeches" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, ILOnline <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2013-12-15 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p210895_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan have often been described as political "soul-mates" with a shared conservative political philosophy and a "conviction" leadership style. While a general acceptance of the similarities of these leaders has taken hold in both the academic and popular literatures, no one yet has sought to challenge empirically the merit of this premise. To what extent did their shared beliefs overshadow other, perhaps even quite fundamental, differences in their views on governing and public policy? Using a sample of the major speeches of both leaders, we employ automated content analysis ("Alceste" software) to measure statistically (using the chi-square statistic) and spatially (using correspondence analysis) the rhetoric unique to each leader while in office as prime minister and president. We recognize the importance of rhetoric to the leadership effectiveness of Thatcher and Reagan--both often characterized as populist leaders--advancing many of the same themes in their major addresses, but also conveying some differences. Hence, our approach enables us to analyze empirically each and every word of our sampled major addresses, thereby extracting not only the themes associated with each leader, but also to gauge the relative statistical significance of these themes as they relate to each leader. Our aim is to identify not only the shared rhetoric of the leaders but more revealingly, to identify and measure significant differences--which in turn, enables us to understand better their styles of political leadership. The results of our analysis are striking and somewhat surprising. While the two leaders agreed on the importance of the Soviet threat and on some aspects of domestic economic policy, Reagan was unique in using religious symbols to describe American exceptionalism (American civil religion) while Thatcher was unique in shaping conservatism around domestic economic policy goals such as privatization. In short, our approach allows us to identify and measure empirically both the shared themes and the differences between the two conservative leaders.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.


Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 51
Word count: 15532
Text sample:
“Measuring Rhetorical Leadership: A Textual Analysis of Margaret Thatcher’s and Ronald Reagan’s Speeches ” Yager & Schonhardt-Bailey 8/12/2007 1 of 46 Measuring Rhetorical Leadership: A Textual Analysis of Margaret Thatcher’s and Ronald Reagan’s Speeches Edward M. Yager Professor of Political Science Western Kentucky University Grise Hall 310 1906 College Heights Blvd Bowling Green KY 42101 Ph 270 745 6190 edward.yager@wku.edu Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey Reader in Political Science Government Department London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A
| 14 | | *Nov81 | 5 Conservatism (R & T) 15 | | *Jun83 #06*Feb80*Nov88*Jul84 | 16 | | *May79 | 6 Procedures & Rhetoric of H 17 | *Nov86 | *Jun87 | 18 | *Nov90 *HCspeech | of C (Thatcher) 19 | |*Thatcher *Nov82*Nov85 | 20 | | *Nov80 | 21 | | *Nov84 | +-----|---------|---------|---------+---------|---------|---------|-----+


Similar Titles:
A Quantitative Comparison of Major Democratic National Convention Speeches by High-Profile African American Political Leaders: How Is Race Treated?

Representation of the Politically Vulnerable: A class-based analysis of African American Political Representation

The Democratic Leadership Assessment (DLA): A New Three-Dimensional Tool for Measuring Political Leaders' Impact on Democratic Governance


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.

Short essay about Mrs.. Thatcher’s Brumes speech Margaret Thatcher as we all know, was a very intelligent, firm and decided person, one of the greatest and most popular characters of the international ambit, first and only woman as a Prime Minister, which gave her the name of “The iron Lady’. Her speech, long and concise, I think was very touching and had a lot of important Information to consider back then and what Is more Impressive is that It is still so actual that almost seem to be written just a few years ago. Except, of course, of some sentences, for example, she talked about the big and emerging powers such as

United States and Japan, but as we know, wealth the last decades, Japan has decreased its economy and development and instead, China has been increasing its economy at the point to be today the biggest economy in the world. It is difficult to say whether the speech is amiable or not, at some point it makes you feel almost like if she was talking about some utopian status she would like to reach. Of course, the goal of every head of state, president or Primer Minister it’s to accomplished great development and economy to Its own country.

Margaret Thatcher, I think had extra erasure Just because of the fact that she was a woman, in such a big and important spot, she of course, shows off all of the events and efficient moments that Great Britain has had along the history, she mention the protection Britain gave to people under tyranny, she also say how big and important it is London, know they have entered the Single Market, opening its frontiers, but not in the security aspect, because that was one of the Issues that Thatcher emphasizes to the other nations: ‘*we cannot totally abolish frontier controls if we are also to protect our citizens from rime and stop the movement of drugs, of terrorists and of illegal immigrants”. I think she has good points regarding Its frontiers and It Is understandable that such powerful and wealthy country and maybe that has helped Great Britain. Thatcher’s ideas and principles about the European identity are objective and I like the way she states the positive aspects In which Britain and other countries are working but she also says negative aspects with constructive comments about some other things that Europe is not doing very well or has not achieve completely well.

Need Essay Sample?
We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you for only $12.90/page


order now

0 thoughts on “Margaret Thatcher Speeches Analysis Essay”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *